<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Test One Two. Is this thing on?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2003/07/test-one-two-is-this-thing-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2003/07/test-one-two-is-this-thing-on/</link>
	<description>Unclarifying the issues since 2000</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 04:49:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2003/07/test-one-two-is-this-thing-on/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 23:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=484#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Hmm . . . I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re asking for has anything to do with a local blog client for posting to your own blog, but what the heck -- anyplace is a good place for a rant about features you want! Why not here in the comments to my post! :-)
I think the easiest way to do what you&#039;re suggesting, Stephen, might be through Trackback. You&#039;re basically talking about &quot;remote comments&quot; -- the comment is created on your site, but appears in some form on the appropriate post on my site. See the use case described in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.movabletype.org/trackback/beginners/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Beginner&#039;s Guide to Trackback&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;Person A has written a post on his own weblog that comments on a post in Person B&#039;s weblog. This is a form of remote comments--rather than posting the comment directly on Person B&#039;s weblog, Person A posts it on his own weblog, then sends a TrackBack ping to notify Person B.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;How the notifying ping appears on Person B&#039;s site is up to Person B, though. On my site, there&#039;s a Trackback link that references the sites that have pinged mine via Trackback. Ergo, your &quot;remote comment&quot; wouldn&#039;t appear in the comments area, but be linked in the Trackback area.
It isn&#039;t required to be that way, though. Some people treat comments and Trackbacks as virtually the same thing. For example, look at a &lt;a href=&quot;http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/07/03/other_things.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.diveintomark.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mark Pilgrim&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s site and you&#039;ll see comments and Trackbacks mixed together.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm . . . I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re asking for has anything to do with a local blog client for posting to your own blog, but what the heck &#8212; anyplace is a good place for a rant about features you want! Why not here in the comments to my post! :-)<br />
I think the easiest way to do what you&#8217;re suggesting, Stephen, might be through Trackback. You&#8217;re basically talking about &#8220;remote comments&#8221; &#8212; the comment is created on your site, but appears in some form on the appropriate post on my site. See the use case described in <a href="http://www.movabletype.org/trackback/beginners/" rel="nofollow">A Beginner&#8217;s Guide to Trackback</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Person A has written a post on his own weblog that comments on a post in Person B&#8217;s weblog. This is a form of remote comments&#8211;rather than posting the comment directly on Person B&#8217;s weblog, Person A posts it on his own weblog, then sends a TrackBack ping to notify Person B.</p></blockquote>
<p>How the notifying ping appears on Person B&#8217;s site is up to Person B, though. On my site, there&#8217;s a Trackback link that references the sites that have pinged mine via Trackback. Ergo, your &#8220;remote comment&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t appear in the comments area, but be linked in the Trackback area.<br />
It isn&#8217;t required to be that way, though. Some people treat comments and Trackbacks as virtually the same thing. For example, look at a <a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/07/03/other_things.html" rel="nofollow">post</a> on <a href="http://www.diveintomark.org" rel="nofollow">Mark Pilgrim</a>&#8217;s site and you&#8217;ll see comments and Trackbacks mixed together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kalsey</title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2003/07/test-one-two-is-this-thing-on/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Kalsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 22:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=484#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Stephen,
All you&#039;d need to do is add a comments form to your RSS feed. Each item could list all the comments and have a copy of the MT comments form.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen,<br />
All you&#8217;d need to do is add a comments form to your RSS feed. Each item could list all the comments and have a copy of the MT comments form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Downes</title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2003/07/test-one-two-is-this-thing-on/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2003 07:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=484#comment-122</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s nice, but...
What would be *really* nice is a system whereby, from the information supplied in a post&#039;s RSS, a comment could be made and uploaded to the original page. This would allow me to provide a facility in my aggregator where people could comment there, and have them appear on the original site as well as on the aggregator.
Perhaps such a system exists and I don&#039;t know about it. If not, would someone please hurry up and invent it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s nice, but&#8230;<br />
What would be *really* nice is a system whereby, from the information supplied in a post&#8217;s RSS, a comment could be made and uploaded to the original page. This would allow me to provide a facility in my aggregator where people could comment there, and have them appear on the original site as well as on the aggregator.<br />
Perhaps such a system exists and I don&#8217;t know about it. If not, would someone please hurry up and invent it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

