<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ten Reasons Why &#187; Technology &amp; Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/category/technology-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog</link>
	<description>Unclarifying the issues since 2000</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Three Easy Steps for Apple to take on Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2010/08/three-easy-steps-for-apple-to-take-on-sony-nintendo-and-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2010/08/three-easy-steps-for-apple-to-take-on-sony-nintendo-and-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s how Apple gets into the gaming console market:
Step 1: Launch the Apple Game Center as part of iOS 4.1
Step 2: Put iOS 4.1 on Apple TV
Step 3: Uh . . . there is no Step 3.
Okay, so it is highly unlikely that an A4-powered Apple TV (or iTV or however they brand it) is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s how Apple gets into the gaming console market:</p>
<p><strong>Step 1: </strong>Launch the <a href="http://developer.apple.com/technologies/iphone/whats-new.html#gamecenter">Apple Game Center</a> as part of iOS 4.1</p>
<p><strong>Step 2:</strong> <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31021_3-20013393-260.html">Put iOS 4.1 on Apple TV</a></p>
<p><strong>Step 3: </strong>Uh . . . there is no Step 3.</p>
<p>Okay, so it is highly unlikely that an A4-powered Apple TV (or iTV or however they brand it) is going to offer much that is desirable to the <em>Call Of Duty</em>-style hardcore gamer, but the Nintendo Wii and the Facebook/Farmville combo have already proven there&#8217;s a huge, under-served market of casual gamers drooling for interactive games that don&#8217;t involve getting pwned by a 14-year old with Mountain Dew-fueled catlike reflexes.</p>
<p>Plus, the iTunes media empire puts the media capabilities &#8212; and catalogs &#8212; of traditional gaming consoles to shame. And, if, as rumored, the price point for the new Apple TV offering is a very attractive <a title=". . . and sell the blades" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freebie_marketing">give-away-the-razor</a> $99, then the game console big boys might be scrambling to try to get into a new market segment they&#8217;ve ignored for decades.</p>
<p>And if Apple wants to really bring the <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/04/05/unicorn-tears">unicorn tears</a>, my secretest, bestest wish is that <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2010/07/26/tivo-spikes-on-rumors-of-deal-with-apple-on-new-apple-tv/">Apple TV bundle a TiVo app</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2010/08/three-easy-steps-for-apple-to-take-on-sony-nintendo-and-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Readability, or Maybe I&#8217;m Just Getting Old</title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2009/08/readability-or-maybe-im-just-getting-old/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2009/08/readability-or-maybe-im-just-getting-old/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 13:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology & Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, I found myself having to remove my glasses to read a piece of paper in my hand. A quick trick to the optometrist confirmed that it was time to start to be more like my Dad and switch to progressive lenses. In case you&#8217;re still a kid, &#8220;progressive lenses&#8221; is the modern euphemism [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, I found myself having to remove my glasses to read a piece of paper in my hand. A quick trick to the optometrist confirmed that it was time to start to be more like my Dad and switch to progressive lenses. In case you&#8217;re still a kid, &#8220;progressive lenses&#8221; is the modern euphemism for &#8220;bifocals&#8221; (because bifocals seems so &#8212; I don&#8217;t know &#8212; so <em>Ben Franklin</em>). But progessives are also like &#8220;stealth&#8221; bifocals because they don&#8217;t have that little sideways D-shaped lens-within-a-lens my grandmother&#8217;s glasses had. Whew. Still hip.</p>
<p>Anyway. Perhaps another evidence of my increasing Ben Franklinness is my newfound love of <a href="http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability/">Readability</a>, a little product from the <a href="http://www.arc90.com/lab/">Arc90 Labs</a>.</p>
<p>Readability is a configurable bookmarklet you drop in  your browser toolbar. Say you encounter a page for a magazine article or weblog post that has a narrow column of tiny type (at least to my increasingly Franklinesque eyesight), like this:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/picture-1-300x160.png" alt="screenshot of the NewYorker.com" title="screenshot of the NewYorker.com" width="300" height="160" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-718" /></p>
<p>You click the Readability bookmarklet, and it reformats the page for you, stripping out all of the cruft (headers, ads, linkrolls, etc.) providing you with a simple <em>readable</em> format, like so:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/picture-3-300x184.png" alt="picture-3" title="picture-3" width="300" height="184" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-726" /></p>
<p>My eyes thank you, Arc 90.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2009/08/readability-or-maybe-im-just-getting-old/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable licenses</title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2008/04/royalty-free-perpetual-irrevocable-non-exclusive-transferable-licenses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2008/04/royalty-free-perpetual-irrevocable-non-exclusive-transferable-licenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With disappointing repetitiveness, I stumble across some bozo up in arms over some company that&#8217;s attempting to &#8220;steal your copyright.&#8221; These are usually in a lather because they&#8217;ve actually read the Terms of Service for [insert web-based application here] and noticed language that looks something like this:
&#8220;the submitting user grants [company] the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With disappointing repetitiveness, I stumble across some bozo up in arms over some company that&#8217;s attempting to &#8220;steal your copyright.&#8221; These are usually in a lather because they&#8217;ve actually read the Terms of Service for [insert web-based application here] and noticed language that looks something like this:<br />
<blockquote>&#8220;the submitting user grants [company] the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, and display such Content (in whole or part) worldwide and/or to incorporate it in other works in any form, media, or technology now known or later developed, all subject to the terms of any applicable license.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>A good example is <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=502054&amp;cid=22886666">this comment</a> on the Slashdot story last week about <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/03/27/2015220.shtml">Adobe launching an online version of Photoshop Express</a>. I&#8217;ve had to deal with these kind of complaints for the web properties I&#8217;m responsible for, but my annoyance is nothing new. The first time I remember coming across complaints about these kind of terms is almost a decade ago when <a href="http://www.news.com/2100-1023-227916.html">Yahoo! took over Geocities</a>. It annoyed me even back then when I was just a humble ed tech trainer, not a product manager responsible for honest-to-goodness web applications.<br />
Although I am not a lawyer and you definitely shouldn&#8217;t take legal advice from me, let me explain to you what the heck is going on here: it&#8217;s called the Internet.</p>
<p><span id="more-689"></span><br />
When you upload your content from your computer to [insert web-based application here] you are <em>transferring</em> that content from your computer to the centrally-hosted web application that, presumably, will <em>reproduce</em> that content when it serves it up for <em>display</em> to you or someone else on the web page. This is is commonly known as <em>publishing</em> in web parlance, a way to <em>distribute</em> content over the <em>World Wide</em> Web. Etc. etc. Terms starting to sound familiar?<br />
The Web works by making copies of content and transmitting/distributing those copies all over hell and back anytime someone views a web page, not to mention all the caching of copies. Any company that&#8217;s going to get into the business of helping you put content of any sort on the web needs to get your permission to do fling that content all over the globe.<br />
If the vendor didn&#8217;t explicitly make the license to do that part of the terms, then some <em>other</em> bozo is going to come along and say &#8220;I uploaded a photo to your photo sharing site, and you had the unmitigated gall to &#8212; horror or horrors &#8212; transmit my content to the web browser of someone, and in the process of doing so allowed them to cache a copy of that photo on their own computer! How dare you! I&#8217;m suing you for copyright infringement, Mr. Vendor!&#8221; The type of terms like those quoted above are about how the web works and making sure that some litigious jackass doesn&#8217;t sue the vendor over doing what&#8217;s necessary for a web app to exist. It&#8217;s <em>not</em> about &#8220;stealing copyright.&#8221;<br />
So, you &#8220;stealing copyright&#8221; bozos, please stop getting your knickers in a twist. Put your tinfoil hat back on and wait by the front door for the black helicopters.<br />
Oh, by the way, the quoted terms above? They&#8217;re quoted from the <a href="http://web.sourceforge.com/terms.php">Slashdot Terms of Service</a>. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2008/04/royalty-free-perpetual-irrevocable-non-exclusive-transferable-licenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seriously, RIM, have you no shame?</title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2008/03/seriously-rim-have-you-no-shame/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2008/03/seriously-rim-have-you-no-shame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the shape, coloring, and body design of RIM&#8217;s new Blackberry 9000 look vaguely similar to any other product to you guys, too?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the shape, coloring, and body design of <a href="http://www.rim.com">RIM</a>&#8217;s new <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/03/28/blackberry-9000-in-the-wild/">Blackberry 9000</a> look vaguely similar to any <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=iphone">other product</a> to you guys, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2008/03/seriously-rim-have-you-no-shame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you a hotshot UI designer?</title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2007/08/are-you-a-hotshot-ui-designer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2007/08/are-you-a-hotshot-ui-designer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology & Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t write about work on this blog, but my team at Blackboard is hiring a UI hotshot to work on Web 2.0-ish education applications. Having a full-time UI designer on my team will make my life a lot less stressful (borrowed resources &#038; contractors make my head hurt), so I figured it can&#8217;t hurt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t write about work on this blog, but my team at <a href="http://www.blackboard.com">Blackboard</a> is hiring a UI hotshot to work on Web 2.0-ish education applications. Having a full-time UI designer on my team will make my life a lot less stressful (borrowed resources &#038; contractors make my head hurt), so I figured it can&#8217;t hurt to reach out wherever I can.<br />
Check out the full job description for the <a href="http://www.blackboard.com/company/careers/job.aspx?id=692">Senior User Interface Designer position</a>. This isn&#8217;t an entry-level position. We&#8217;re looking for someone with some serious UI design &#038; AJAX chops to really make user interface and user interaction a focus on a team that&#8217;s focused on new product development. The team, the <a href="http://www.blackboard.com/communities/beyond/">Blackboard Beyond Initiative</a>, is a new division  within the company that&#8217;s focused on building centrally hosted web applications, a different approach than Blackboard&#8217;s traditional enterprise, server-based product line.<br />
Consequently, the team is sort of a start-up within the company, with both the benefits (more freedom to innovate, not hindered by legacy code or interfaces, etc.) and the challenges (yeah, we could use more headcount). One start-up challenge we don&#8217;t have, though, is the worry about where the next paycheck comes from, since Blackboard a stable public company with a market cap over a billion dollars.<br />
Blackboard&#8217;s a great place to work &#8212; casual environment with lots of fun, <em>really</em> smart people. I&#8217;ve stayed at Blackboard for over 8 years now, longer than I&#8217;ve stayed at any other job, so they must be doing something right. Of course, I&#8217;m the product director for the Beyond team, so a potential downside is that you&#8217;d have to put up with me on a daily basis. ;-)<br />
If you or someone you know sounds like a good fit, submit your resume through the regular channels, but drop me an email as well at my work address, <a href="mailto:greg.ritter@blackboard.com">greg.ritter@blackboard.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2007/08/are-you-a-hotshot-ui-designer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accessing Your Computer&#8217;s Files Remotely Via iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2007/07/accessing-your-computers-files-remotely-via-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2007/07/accessing-your-computers-files-remotely-via-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 22:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology & Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;m out and about earlier today and realize that some information I need is in a file on my MacBook Pro . . . which of course is sitting at home on my desk. Sigh. 
Waitaminute. I&#8217;ve got a brand new portable Internet device in my pocket. Wouldn&#8217;t it be simple if I could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m out and about earlier today and realize that some information I need is in a file on my MacBook Pro . . . which of course is sitting at home on my desk. Sigh. </p>
<p>Waitaminute. I&#8217;ve got a <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">brand new portable Internet device</a> in my pocket. Wouldn&#8217;t it be simple if I could just access the files on my home computer from the iPhone?</p>
<p>Waitanotherminute. I use <a href="http://www.foldershare.com">FolderShare</a>, a free service from Microsoft, to keep key files on my multiple computers in sync across the various machines. One of FolderShare&#8217;s other features is that you can use the FolderShare web interface to access files on any of the machines that you&#8217;ve configured with FolderShare. Maybe I could access those files via FolderShare&#8217;s web interface and Safari on the iPhone?</p>
<p>Holdonthereaminute! Are you sure this is secure? Well, FolderShare is a <a href="https://www.foldershare.com/info/faq/Security.php?#security01">secure P2P infrastructure</a>. All the traffic is authenticated via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA">RSA</a>, encrypted via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES">AES</a>, and delivered over <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSL">SSL</a>. Good enough for me. Let&#8217;s give it a shot. </p>
<p>Starting up Safari on the iPhone . . . thumbing <a href="http://www.foldershare.com">http://www.foldershare.com</a> into the iPhone keyboard . . . yep, there&#8217;s the site . . . logging into FolderShare . . . navigating to the FolderShare Remote Access interface . . . yep, the FolderShare client on my home computer is running . . . click on that icon for my home computer . . . zowee! there&#8217;s the Home directory . . . navigating to the Documents folder . . . scrolling down the list of files . . . bingo! there&#8217;s the file . . . opening . . . </p>
<p>Ta-dah! There I am sitting in the bookstore viewing a PDF pulled off my computer at home over the Internet on my iPhone. </p>
<p>Sometimes technology makes me really happy. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2007/07/accessing-your-computers-files-remotely-via-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Total Time to get an iPhone: </title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2007/06/total-time-to-get-an-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2007/06/total-time-to-get-an-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology & Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a whim I drove by the Apple Store in the Clarendon neighborhood of Arlington, VA, after grabbing an omelet at Pete&#8217;s Diner this morning. The Clarendon Apple Store is in a little shopping center called Market Commons that has a U-shaped road looped through it. There&#8217;s almost never parking in the loop, but I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a whim I drove by the Apple Store in the Clarendon neighborhood of Arlington, VA, after grabbing an omelet at Pete&#8217;s Diner this morning. The Clarendon Apple Store is in a little shopping center called Market Commons that has a <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&#038;hl=en&#038;geocode=&#038;q=clarendon,+va&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;ll=38.88773,-77.09129&#038;spn=0.002255,0.004672&#038;t=k&#038;z=18&#038;om=1">U-shaped road looped</a> through it. There&#8217;s almost never parking in the loop, but I told myself <em>if</em> there was no line at the Apple Store and <em>if</em> there was parking <em>in the loop</em>, I&#8217;d buy myself an iPhone.<br />
I figured I was saving myself some money by making that deal.<br />
Oops.<br />
The loop&#8217;s one way, so you have to drive all the way around it to get to the Apple Store on the east side. I could see there was no line outside the store. As I rounded the corner of the loop, I saw an SUV pulling out of a parking space <em>right in front of the Apple Store</em>.  Yes, I got a space less than 10 feet from the door of the Apple Store. I got out walked in and walked straight to the demo table where the floor samples of the iPhone were set up. As I walked up, another guy walked away and with a grand total of zero seconds waiting time, I was playing with an iPhone.<br />
It really took only a few minutes to confirm that I wanted one. I checked a few websites, played a song, flicked the contact list up and down, badda bing, badda boom, turned around and walked the eight feet to the front counter <em>where there was no one in line</em> and bought an iPhone (8GB model).<br />
I would have been out of the store in under 6 minutes, except as soon as the cashier handed me the box, I realized the iPhone doesn&#8217;t come with a belt clip of any kind, so it took another four minutes or so to grab a simple, inexpensive belt clip and get back to the cashier &#8212; <em>still no line</em> &#8212; and buy the clip.<br />
Total time elapsed from getting out of the car to getting back into the car with an iPhone &#8212; less than 15 minutes.<br />
I had to text (from the old Sony Ericsson) my friend, Bug (a nickname, but he answers to it) and gloat a bit. He&#8217;s an Apple diehard &#8212; the man has three 30&#8243; Apple Cinema Displays on his desk, and I lost count of the number of Apple computers he owns. He did some intermediate (read: hours, but not double digit hours) line waiting yesterday evening.<br />
Gloating was unnecessary. He was at the Bethesda, MD, Apple Store getting his second (or third maybe) iPhone, and having the same speedy experience.<br />
Should anyone really have expected any different? I&#8217;m sure it might be different in some of the densely populated areas like NYC or geek-heavy regions like San Francisco and Silicon Valley, but Apple is not like Sony delivering a new playstation. Apple doesn&#8217;t have to under-manufacture the hardware to manufacture demand through scarcity, because they are expert at creating demand <em>before</em> the release.<br />
So the iPhone is activated now and going through the first sync with iTunes which is nearly done, so I&#8217;ll finish up this post and write a full review later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2007/06/total-time-to-get-an-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When 20/20 Hindsight Makes You Want To Blind Yourself</title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2007/06/when-2020-hindsight-makes-you-want-to-blind-yourself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2007/06/when-2020-hindsight-makes-you-want-to-blind-yourself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology & Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s hard to feel sorry for James Hong. As one of the two co-founders of HOTorNOT, the oft-copied photo rating site, he&#8217;s raked in the dough. For years, HOTorNOT was run leanly, with little investment in development and lots of advertising revenue. Hong himself describes it as a cash cow.
Recently Hong has been re-inventing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to feel sorry for James Hong. As one of the two co-founders of <a href="http://www.hotornot.com">HOTorNOT</a>, the oft-copied photo rating site, he&#8217;s raked in the dough. For years, HOTorNOT was run leanly, with little investment in development and lots of advertising revenue. Hong himself describes it as a cash cow.<br />
Recently Hong has been re-inventing the aging HOTorNOT, and he has <a title="James Hong: Reinventing HOTorNOT, Part I" href="http://james.hotornot.com/2007/06/reinventing-hotornot-part-i.html">written about it on his blog</a>.<br />
It&#8217;s a good read in general, but this is the part that made me groan out load. He describes their initial strategy to re-invent the business:</p>
<blockquote><p>[O]ur original vision was to become an incubator and to enable our employees to work on new ideas, and let them spin those off as separate companies.. basically let our employees graduate into becoming funded entrepreneurs at a time when funding was hard to get. Our first and only attempt at this was back in 2003 when we hoped to <b>work with Steve Chen and Mike Solomon to start Yafro.com, which was going to be a social networking site with media sharing applications built on top</b>. [Emphasis mine. -greg]<br />
In the end things did not work out because some members of our board were uncomfortable with the idea of giving the employees of a spinout majority share and control… so Jim and I agreed with Steve and Mike that it was a no go.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sounds reasonable until a couple of years later when you realize you punted on funding a <em>social media-sharing service</em> being pushed by <em>Steve Chen</em>. Yes, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Chen_%28YouTube%29"><em>that</em> Steve Chen</a>.<br />
I&#8217;m sure the tens of millions Hong has raked in from HOTorNOT allays the pain a little, but still . . . <em>damn</em>, that&#8217;s gotta burn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2007/06/when-2020-hindsight-makes-you-want-to-blind-yourself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Switch Part 1: The Demise of the Dell</title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2006/08/switch-part-1-the-demise-of-the-dell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2006/08/switch-part-1-the-demise-of-the-dell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology & Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The old Dell Inspiron 8200 notebook did right by me, and, in general, it&#8217;s been the best computer I&#8217;ve ever owned. My basic computing activity has changed a lot in the last four years &#8212; I&#8217;m arguably online more hours per week than I&#8217;ve ever been before, thanks primarily to getting off the road and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old Dell Inspiron 8200 notebook did right by me, and, in general, it&#8217;s been the best computer I&#8217;ve ever owned. My basic computing activity has changed a lot in the last four years &#8212; I&#8217;m arguably online more hours per week than I&#8217;ve ever been before, thanks primarily to getting off the road and broadband in the home. For the most part, the Dell kept up with my needs. Unfortunately, it was getting a bit gray around the temples. Time to switch.</p>
<p><span id="more-660"></span><br />
The Dell has been getting cantankerous for almost a year now. The original 40GB hard drive on the Inspiron gave up the ghost last fall. (Thankfully less than a week after I&#8217;d bought an external hard drive for back-up purposes &#8212; how&#8217;s that for serendipity?) Simple enough to replace it with a new 80GB hard drive. Well, simple except that the old HD must have been pneumatically screwed into the HD tray frame. I had to buy a new tray off eBay to put the new drive in, since I mangled the old frame trying to get the old drive out.<br />
That delayed my HD upgrade by about a week while I waited for the new HD to arrive, so during that week I booted the Inspiron off a bootable Ubuntu Linux CD and saved any work to a USB key or the external HD. Craziness, but it worked just fine. Apparently, you don&#8217;t <em>need</em> an internal HD with an OS on it to run your computer. Its more just a convenience than anything else. :-)<br />
Then, in the winter, one of the two fans built into the Inspiron started to fail with ear-endangering grinding noises. I considered replacing the fans, but apparently the way the Inspiron is laid out, you have to remove the entire motherboard to replace the fans. Ugh. Too much geekery even for me. Instead, in an attempt to keep the CPU cool I found a little <a href="http://www.diefer.de/i8kfan/">free app for manual control of the Inspiron&#8217;s fan</a>. That let me disable the grinding fan, and control when the remaining good one kicked in and at what speed – enough control to keep the CPU adequately cooled. I also invested about $35 in a <a href="http://www.provantage.com/targus-awe01us~7TGUA06M.htm">cooling pad</a> (which also conveniently doubled as a USB hub) to assist in the anti-heat campaign, but which unfortunately added about three-quarters of an inch to the height of the already-thick Inspiron. But I&#8217;m frugal (comes from being a teacher for years before I got into the software biz), so I made do.<br />
This cobbled together solution kept me going for another six months, but last week the second, remaining fan started making the same grinding noises. I&#8217;d already been toying with getting a new computer, even as far as proclaiming to a co-worker a week earlier that I was going to buy one of the new Intel-based MacBook Pros over the weekend. I even went to the Apple Store that weekend, but couldn&#8217;t really justify purchasing a new computer because &#8220;the Dell was still holding its own.&#8221; (That frugality again.)<br />
But, man, when that second fan started moaning like a horror movie monster, my ass was in the car on the way to the Apple Store in minutes. Oh, I could probably have figured out some way to keep the Dell going for another couple of months, but frankly there comes a point when enough&#8217;s enough. I&#8217;m not broke, I make a decent living &#8212; I can afford a new computer. So rather than deal with the headache of keeping the Dell on life support, I am now the owner of a brand spanking new MacBook Pro (the 15&#8243; 2.166 Ghz model).<br />
Up next: Why Mac?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2006/08/switch-part-1-the-demise-of-the-dell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going Mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2006/04/going-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2006/04/going-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology & Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/?p=658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, I got a Tablet PC courtesy of my boss. (Thanks, Dan!) This is my first ever blog post written by hand. Literally &#8212; by hand, with a stylus, in digital ink, on the tablet. So far I have only corrected the handwriting recognition twice in this paragraph. I&#8217;m finding that it actually does better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I got a Tablet PC courtesy of my boss. (Thanks, Dan!) This is my first ever blog post written by hand. Literally &#8212; by hand, with a stylus, in digital ink, on the tablet. So far I have only corrected the handwriting recognition twice in this paragraph. I&#8217;m finding that it actually does better if I don&#8217;t try to compensate for bad handwriting. Damn. Okay three times. :)</p>
<p><span id="more-658"></span><br />
There&#8217;s really no comparison between the handwriting recognition entry and typing. Typing is FAR easier. Lower case L&#8217;s are a bitch, too. But I am impressed with the quality of the recognition. The tablet PC is definitely is useful for taking notes in a meeting, though. Clacking away on a keyboard during a meeting is annoying, but note-taking on a tablet PC makes no more noise than on paper. And I have the advantage of (1) the notes not disappearing into the impending avalanche of paper stacked on the corner of my desk as do all my paper notes and (2) the eminently useful searchability of the notes. Still, typing wins in 90% of the use cases, but it&#8217;s nice to have the digital ink option for those last 10%.[*]<br />
What I really like is the light weight of the tablet PC. This tablet, a two-year old hand-me-down <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/Acer_TravelMate_C110/4505-3126_7-21188968.html">Acer Travelmate C110</a>, is geared towards mobility, so it&#8217;s tiny. Sure you can recline on the couch with a laptop, but it&#8217;s usually a precarious balancing act and you can only deal so long before the battery heat starts burning a hole in some body part. With the tablet, it&#8217;s not much heavier than a thick hardcover book, and I have to say &#8212; web browsing with your feet up is a really different experience. At two years old, this model is getting a little outmoded even; I can imagine that the new <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2006/mar06/03-09Mobile.mspx">&#8220;Origami&#8221; ultra-mobile PC&#8217;s</a> announced by Microsoft last month are going to generate a new form factor.<br />
In the past, I&#8217;ve had discussions with friends and colleagues about the impending doom the publishing industry faces as books become digitized in the way music and video have. Their response has always been, &#8220;But the <em>experience </em>of reading a paper book is what will save it.&#8221; Balderdash, I say! It&#8217;s just a matter of the device&#8217;s form factor. Once a device capable of displaying text at a high enough resolution can be reduced to something approaching the size/weight of a trade paperback, people will just as quickly abandon the printed book as they have abandoned the cassettes, VHS, CDs, and DVDs. . . . especially if they can get fast and easy wireless access to downloadable books via the Internet. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_tail">Long tail</a> anyone?<br />
My recent tablet PC experience convinces me that we&#8217;re getting much closer to that ideal form factor that&#8217;s going to shake up the publishing industry for good.<br />
[*] Full disclosure: the latter half of this post &#8212; basically everything after the asterisk &#8212; was not written by hand on the tablet PC, but really for no other reason than I had saved it before I finished, forgot about it, and finished it a couple days later when I was already working on a laptop. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/2006/04/going-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

